In-house teams

Answer for the spend, and for what gets made with it.

Your CFO wants last quarter's cost per order by channel. Meta claims 412, your database recorded 780, and this same week was supposed to decide what you make next.

  • Your own database is the arbiter
  • Sends only where you registered
  • Evidence, never a causal claim
You

Where did last month's spend go, and what did it actually produce?

Reading Meta, Google and your orders table for Q3

Against what your database recorded.

SourceConversions
Meta412
Google308
Other platforms510
Total claimed1,230
Your database780

450 conversions are counted more than once.

Read fromMeta AdsGoogle AdsYour database

What it costs today

Your week goes to reporting. Your creative fatigues while it does.

58%

Of the week on optimisation and testing, by buyers who hit their ROAS target

AdSnipper, 2026

51%

Of the week on reporting and meetings, by buyers who miss it

AdSnipper, 2026

28%

Performance lost to creative fatigue, which lands three to four weeks in

Admetrics, 2026

Your week

The same five days, minus the afternoon you lose to the deck.

    Monday

    Pull the weekend across four platforms before anyone asks.

    The scan ran overnight. You start from what changed.

    Midweek

    Leadership asks what the quarter bought. It takes an afternoon.

    You ask once and the answer is checked against your own revenue.

    Month end

    Rebuild the same deck, reconcile the numbers that disagree.

    It arrives built, on schedule, in the channel leadership reads.

Spend decided on your own data, and time to decide what to make next.

The treadmill

You need thirty a month. You can make ten.

Fatigue lands three to four weeks in, which is roughly when the replacements were due.

Now
  • Five to ten new creatives a sprint
  • What to make next, decided by whoever argues hardest
  • Results read at reach and engagement, then the trail goes cold
Instead
  • Every asset read against what it ran with
  • The winning pattern named, with the test that would settle it
  • Each brief built on everything made before it, not on the last one

What goes into the ten you can make is chosen from evidence rather than guesses.

A quarter of work

Two hundred assets last quarter. You have looked at maybe twenty.

Platforms report on the ad, never on what is inside it.

Five outperformed the rest, and what they share is in no platform's reporting.

Schematic · a quarter of work, read in full

Before you ask

Three that come up every time.

We already have a dashboard. What is different?

A dashboard shows what someone chose to put on it months ago, from platforms reporting in their own favour. This answers the question you have not asked yet.

Will this reduce our work to a metric?

The opposite. It refuses to tell you a creative caused a result, because how the platform chose to serve an ad is tangled up in how that ad performed. You get the pattern across everything you made, and the test that would settle it.

Does it read video, or only statics?

Both, and the text inside them. Video is read scene by scene with a timestamped transcript, statics including their copy, and each is keyed to the ad, campaign, product, offer or audience it ran against.

Start here

Bring last quarter, and the number leadership asks about.

We connect what needs nothing applied for, put the two beside each other, and you keep what it says.

Usually 45 minutes  ·  APAC (GMT+6), working across time zones